Submitted: The Two Sides Team July 15, 2013
July 15, 2013
Below is the second progress report on our ongoing campaign to promote best practices for environmental marketing of print and paper products. We issued ourfirst report in April 2013 which also included the background and rationale for the campaign.
Progress to Date
Number of U.S. companies who have received a first letter from Two Sides-48
Number of additional cases that Two Sides has referred to member companies and allies-14
Total cases to date-62
Number of companies who have removed their anti-paper environmental claims-13
Success rate-21%
Number of companies who have responded to Two Sides-32
Number of companies that Two Sides has had (or is having) discussions with-17
Number of companies who have not yet responded-20
Our success rate is now 21% and has increased 7% since the last report. We increased our number of target cases by 8 companies overall, for a total of 62 to date. Many companies have received a second letter from us and more have responded and removed their claims. Just this week I received an encouraging letter from a major West Coast utility company that removed all their green claims related paperless billing. Here is the letter:
________________________________
Dear Mr. Riebel:
This letter is in reply to your January 30, 2013 and June 19, 2013 letters regarding [company name] messaging around electronic billing . Because these issues fall within my area of responsibility, I have been asked to respond to you. In particular, your letters express concerns over messages that encourage customers to switch to on-line billing for environmental reasons.
I appreciate your bringing the concerns of Two Sides U.S. to our attention and your willingness to discuss them. [Company name] takes seriously any suggestion that its messaging to customers might be unreliable or contain inaccuracies.
The statements cited in your letters were, we believe, appropriately incorporated into our customer messaging based on information we had available at that time. Nevertheless, following receipt of your initial letter in January, [company name] reconsidered our messaging and determined that cost savings is the most significant driver for our campaign. As such, we decided to discontinue statements regarding environmental benefits of electronic billing, and to focus on the cost savings associated with electronic billing. Accordingly, we believe our actions have addressed your concerns.
Let me assure you that we share your desire that the public be accurately informed on issues regarding the environment. It is also important to [company name] that our messaging to customers is accurate, reliable, and helpful. {Company name] would therefore welcome any further suggestions you may have in this regard.
Finally, we assume that this matter is now concluded, but please let me know if you believe further discussion would be helpful .
______________________________
There is hope! In other words, it’s more about “fees” than “trees”.
We have agreed not to publicly name companies who are working with us, however a list of all companies and results is available to Two Sides commercial members. Our plan is continue our initiative and start taking actions to convince non-responding companies to pay attention.
Phil Riebel, President and COO, Two Sides US, Inc.